HISTORY 60

Department of History
University of California, Irvine
Instructor:    Dr. Barbara J. Becker

 

Week 6.  Universal Reason

Philosophical Views
of Isaac Newton (1642-1727)

 
"Rules for Philosophizing" from Principia

I. We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true & sufficient to explain their appearances.

[First appeared in 1st ed., 1687]
II. Therefore to the same natural effects we must, as far as possible, assign the same causes.
[First appeared in 1st ed., 1687]
III. The qualities of bodies, which admit neither intensification nor remission of degrees, and which are found to belong to all bodies within the reach of our experiments, are to be esteemed the universal qualities of all bodies whatsoever.
[First appeared in 2nd ed., 1713]
IV. In experimental philosophy we are to look upon propositions inferred by general induction from phenomena as accurately or very nearly true, notwithstanding any contrary hypotheses that may be imagined, till such time as other phenomena occur by which they may either be made more accurate or liable to exceptions.
[First appeared in 3rd ed., 1726]
"General Scholium," from Principia

[First appeared in 2nd ed., 1713]

I have not been able to discover the cause of those properties of gravity from phenomena, & I feign no hypotheses [emphasis added]; for whatever is not deduced from the phenomena is to be called a hypothesis & hypotheses whether metaphysical or physical, whether of occult qualities or mechanical have no place in experimental philosophy.  In this philosophy particular propositions are inferred from the phenomena & afterward rendered general by induction.  Thus it was that the impenetrability the mobility & the impulsive force of bodies, & the laws of motion & of gravitation were discovered. And to us it is enough that gravity does really exist & act according to the laws which we have explained, & abundantly serves to account for all the motions of the celestial bodies & of our sea.

And now we might add something concerning a certain most subtle spirit which pervades & lies hid in all gross bodies, by the force & action of which spirit the particles of bodies attract one another at near distances and cohere, if contiguous; & electric bodies operate to greater distances, as well repelling as attracting the neighboring corpuscles; & light is emitted, reflected, refracted, inflected, & heats bodies; & all sensation is excited, & the members of animal bodies move at the command of the will, namely, by the vibrations of this spirit, mutually propagated along the solid filaments of the nerves, from the outward organs of sense to the brain & from the brain into the muscles.  But these are things that cannot be explained in a few words; nor are we furnished with that sufficiency of experiments which is required to an accurate determination & demonstration of the laws by which this electric and elastic spirit operates.

Excerpt from "Query 31," from Opticks

[First appeared in Latin edition as "Query 23," 1706]

...And thus Nature will be very conformable to herself and very simple, performing all the great motions of the heavenly bodies by the attraction of gravity which intercedes those bodies, and almost all the small ones of their particles by some other attractive and repelling powers which intercede the particles....

It seems probable to me that God in the beginning formed matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable particles, of such sizes and figures, and with such other properties, and in such proportion to space, as most conduced to the end for which he formed them; and that these primitive particles being solids, are incomparably harder than any porous bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces; no ordinary power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first creation.  While the particles continue entire, they may compose bodies of one and the same nature and texture in all ages; but should they wear away, or break in pieces, the nature of things depending on them would be changed.  Water and earth, composed of old worn particles and fragments of particles, would not be of the same nature and texture now, with water and earth composed of entire particles in the beginning.  And, therefore, that Nature may be lasting, the changes of corporeal things are to be placed only in the various separations and new associations and motions of these permanent particles; compound bodies being apt to break, not in the midst of solid particles, but where those particles are laid together, and only touch in a few points.

It seems to me, further, that these particles have not only a vis inertiae, accompanied with such passive laws of motion as naturally result from that force, but also that they are moved by certain active principles, such as is that of gravity, and that which causes fermentation, and the cohesion of bodies.  These principles I consider, not as occult [hidden] qualities, supposed to result from the specific forms of things, but as general laws of nature, by which the things themselves are formed; their truth appearing to us by phenomena, though their causes be not yet discovered. For these are manifest qualities, and their causes only are occult.

And the Aristotelians gave the name of occult qualities, not to manifest qualities, but to such qualities only as they supposed to lie hid in bodies, and to be the unknown causes of manifest effects.  Such as would be the causes of gravity, and of magnetic and electric attractions, and of fermentations, if we should suppose that these forces or actions arose from qualities unknown to us, and incapable of being discovered and made manifest.  Such occult qualities put a stop to the improvement of natural philosophy, and therefore of late years have been rejected.  To tell us that every species of things is endowed with an occult specific quality by which it acts and produces manifest effects, is to tell us nothing; but to derive two or three general principles of motion from phenomena, and afterwards to tell us how the properties and actions of all corporeal things follow from those manifest principles, would be a very great step in philosophy, though the causes of those principles were not yet discovered.  And, therefore, I scruple not to propose the principles of motion above mentioned, they being of very general extent, and leave their causes to be found out.

Now, by the help of these principles, all material things seem to have been composed of the hard and solid particles above mentioned, variously associated in the first creation by the counsel of an intelligent agent.  For it became Him who created them to set them in order.  And if He did so, it's unphilosophical to seek for any other origin of the world, or to pretend that it might arise out of a chaos by the mere laws of Nature; though, being once formed, it may continue by those laws for many ages.  For while comets move in very eccentric orbs in all manner of positions, blind fate could never make all the planets move one and the same way in orbs concentric, some inconsiderable irregularities excepted which may have risen from the mutual actions of comets and planets upon one another, and which will be apt to increase, till this system wants a reformation.  Such a wonderful uniformity in the planetary system must be allowed the effect of choice.

And so must the uniformity in the bodies of animals, they having generally a right and a left side shaped alike, and on either side of their bodies two legs behind, and either two arms, or two legs, or two wings before upon their shoulders, and between their shoulders a neck running down into a backbone, and a head upon it; and in the head two ears, two eyes, a nose, a mouth, and a tongue, alike situated.  Also the first contrivance of those very artificial parts of animals, the eyes, ears, brain, muscles, heart, lungs, midriff, glands, larynx, hands, wings, swimming bladders, natural spectacles, and other organs of sense and motion; and the instinct of brutes and insects can be the effect of nothing else than the wisdom and skill of a powerful, ever-living agent, who being in all places, is more able by His will to move the bodies within His boundless uniform sensorium, and thereby to form and reform the parts of the Universe, than we are by our will to move the parts of our own bodies.

And yet we are not to consider the world as the body of God, or the several parts thereof as the parts of God.  He is a uniform Being, void of organs, members or parts, and they are his creatures subordinate to him, and subservient to His will; and He is no more the soul of them than the soul of man is the soul of the species of things carried through the organs of sense into the place of its sensation, where it perceives them by means of its immediate presence, without the intervention of any third thing.  The organs of sense are not for enabling the soul to perceive the species of things in its sensorium, but only for conveying them thither; and God has no need of such organs, He being everywhere present to the things themselves.  And since space is divisible ad infinitum, and matter is not necessarily in all places, it may be also allowed that God is able to create particles of matter of several sizes and figures, and in several proportions to space, and perhaps of different densities and forces, and thereby to vary the laws of Nature, and make worlds of several sorts in several parts of the Universe.  At least, I see nothing of contradiction in all this....

 
Go to:
  • The Regulæ [Rules for the Direction of the Mind] (1628) by René Descartes (1596-1650);
Weekly Readings
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lecture Notes
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Quodlibets
--
--