EA 190 Shakespeare and Japan Week 8 Outline Comparative Assignment 2 Finish Imagery in King Lear Jay TWO BIG QUESTIONS that concern Kurosawa and Shakespeare: 1) Is there a god or gods who care what happens to human beings? Do we have control over our fate? 2) Can we control violence or will it control us? Connected question: Does evil come from outside human beings or is it solely generated from the human heart and passions? DISCUSSION QUESTION 2 and FORUM on King Lear a. How do Lear or Gloucester understand themselves at the beginning of the play? That is, how do they view themselves, positively or negatively and why? b. How do the characters around them view them? For example, how do Goneril and Reagan view their father? How does Cordelia view him? How do Edmund and Edgar view their father? c. Do you think Lear and Gloucester have learned anything at the end of the play? Can we "moralize" Lear's and Gloucester's experience --that is, is there any lesson to be learned from their suffering/ experience? Why or why not? Cite scenes/lines to support your position. Scenes from King Lear (note that the Trevor Nunn version, with Ian McKellen as Lear, abbreviates the play quite a bit during the mad scenes) Question: Is Lear more sinned against than sinning? End of Act 1 Scene 4, beginning of Act 1 Scene 5 ( Goneril tells Lear that she wants him to cut his retinue in half, and he curses her with sterility; Lear talks with the fool just outside the palace.) Questions: If we only saw the play to this point, would we have much empathy for Lear? For Goneril? Question: When is Lear most mad? When does he seem to come back to his senses? How might this be related to question of whether he learns anything from his suffering? Staging Act 3 Sc 2 "Blow winds" scene (three different stagings) On the heath, after Regan and Cornwall have let Lear leave their palace and go out into the storm: KING LEAR Act 3 Scene 4 Act 4 Scene 6 After Fool is gone (in the Trever Nunn directed version of King Lear they show him being hanged) and Gloucester has been fooled into thinking he has jumped off the cliff, Lear meets Gloucester and Edgar. Note that now Lear takes on the role of Fool as well as King. When you watch Ran, how does Kurosawa handle this scene? KING LEAR [SKIP] GLOUCESTER "Moral" of this class: King Lear is not a simple play, and simplistic moral lessons cannot be drawn from it. Even at the end when two very flawed "good guys" (Edgar and Albany) are left standing, do we actually believe that justice has won out? Do we believe Edgar's moralizing about his father's fault being that he had an adulterous affair with Edmund's mother? Can we believe Edmund's deathbed conversion? And why does Cordelia die? This week and next we'll see how Kurosawa deals with some of the same issues. CLASS ON RAN I. Start with character identification with King Lear Hidetora (Daimyo)= Ayabe (neighboring Daimyo)= Fujimaki (neighboing Daimyo)= Tango (Hidetora's faithful servant/retainer)= Kyoami (Hidetora's fool) = Taro (first son)= Jiro (second son) = Saburo (third son) = Sue (Jiro's wife) = Tsurumaru (Sue's brother) = Kaede (Taro's wife, later Jiro's) = Ikoma (Hidetora's top retainer) = Ogura (Taro's top retainer) = Kurogane (Jiro's top retainer) = II. BASIC STORY (What is left out? What changed? What retained?) QUESTION: What did you think was the main theme of Ran? How is this different from Throne of Blood? A. Kurosawa: "I started out to make a film about Motonari Mori, the 16th century warlord whose three sons are admired in Japan as paragons of filial virtue. What might their story be like, I wondered, if the sons had not been so good? It was only after I was well into writing the script about these imaginary unfilial sons of the Mori clan that the similarities to Lear occurred to me. Since my story is set in medieval Japan, the protagonist's children had to be men; to divide a realm among daughters would have been unthinkable." (Interview with Peter Gilli, p. 60) Question: How does changing Lear's daughters to sons affect the meaning of the story for you? B. Big difference between King Lear and Ran is that in King Lear there isn't much motivation for: 1. Why he divides his kingdom. 2. Why the daughters hate him so much. (A bit more motivation for Edmund maligning Edgar.) C. Kurosawa found this problematic: "What has always troubled me about King Lear is that Shakespeare gives his characters no past. We are plunged directly into the agonies of their present dilemmas without knowing how they come to this point. How did Lear acquire the power that, as an old man, he abuses with such disastrous effects? Without knowing his past, I've never really understood the ferocity of his daughters' response to Lear's feeble attempts to shed his royal power. In Ran I've tried to give Lear a history. I try to make clear that his power must rest on a lifetime of bloodthirsty savagery. Forced to confront the consequences of his misdeeds, he is driven mad. But only by confronting his evil head-on can he transcend it and begin to struggle again toward virtue." [p. 106] 1. Kurosawa added motivations in Throne of Blood for the same kinds of reasons, that he found Shakespeare's opaqueness on this point inexplicable. 2. How does this affect our response to Hidetora? Do we feel more empathy or less for him, given that he has so much bloodier a past? D. Effect of removal of Gloucester subplot, insertion of Kaede/Jiro as Edmund character? Question: How does the subplot of Lady Kaede, Lady Sue and Tsurumaru substitute both for the Gloucester-Edmund-Edgar subplot, and supplement the story line of the filial/unfilial daughters? Discussion Question: Pick one example of how Kurosawa borrows an image or action from Lear and discuss how Kurosawa's borrowing from King Lear moves the character or plot development forward Certain resonances from Shakespeare remain but meaning has changed (examples): a. Saburo shades Hidetora like Edgar shades Gloucestor: What does this tell us about Saburo? b. Hidetora leaps from battlements like Gloucester's "leap" from cliffs of Dover (video: 2:04) (Has a really important effect on the storyline: this is where Kyoami loses him, and this is why Saburo has to go after him on the Asuza plain. Leads to fight between Saburo and Taro and ultimately tragedy.) c. Gloucester and Tsurumaro are both blinded; but by whom? d. At climax Kurogane denouces Kaede as a fox, compared to Albany denoucing Goneril as a fiend: but are Albany and Kurogane equivalent characters?
Summer of Shakespeare: Ran: The Shakespearian Apocalypse Come back to this later in the class after we watch some clips from the movie III. Comparison of opening scenes in King Lear and Ran A. King Lear (review): Shakespeare misdirects us, or is (at best) unclear about who is good and who is evil. 1. Lear wants power and respect without the weight of responsiblity that comes with it ("crawl unburdened to death") B. RAN Opening Scene (watch video) A. What do we know about the characters from this opening scene? 1. Hidetora? 2. What do we know about the brothers and their relationshp to their father? 3. Fujimaki and Ayabe? 4. Is Kurosawa clearer than Shakespeare about the good guys and the bad guys? B. Animal Imagery 1. Boar 2. Kyoami's comic (kyogen) piece with Saburo's comment a. What was kyogen? b. Kurosawa's comment on Kyoami's role in the story C. Weather/natural landscape 1. Use not always straightforward D. Use of Sound 1. Kurosawa: "From Drunken Angel onward I have used light music for some key sad scenes, and my way of using music has differed from the norm--I don't put it in where most people do. Working with Hayasaka I began to think in terms of the counterpoint of sound and image as opposed to the union of sound and image." 2. Use of diegetic versus non-diegetic sound. a. cicadas (Video 55) b. flute C. In Ran we see: 1. A society in which concepts such as "kill or be killed" and "the low overthrow the high" have set the moral framework that Hidetora has followed most of his life, and which he now hopes to end by relinquishing power to his sons. 2. A society in which primogeniture is used to consolidate power within the family, which leaves second and third sons out in the cold (similar to King Lear) NEXT TIME: A "Journey of Self Discovery" for Lear versus Hidetora. 1. At what moments does Hidetora become mad? When is he capable of learning from his mistakes? 2. Question for forum next week: What does Hidetora learn? How does he learn it? And is there any lesson to be drawn from his suffering?
|