Paper Page, Casuistry, Conduct, and Clarissa, Fall 2013

I. Servants: Servants are prominent in the literature of duties or conduct and in Richardson’s fiction. What social, ideological, and fictional functions do servants serve. What problems do servants seem to present to or resolve for the culture “above” them?  What kinds of power do they have? Does casuistry seem to serve them?

Some useful material follows, but talk to me first. Your principal aim will not be to become an expert on servants.
Bruce Robbins, The Servant’s Hand. (Victorian fiction, but more wide-ranging).
Bridgett Hill, Servants: English Domestics in the Eighteenth Century (1996).
J. Jean Hecht, The Domestic Servant Class in England, 1956.

Robert Folkenflik, "Pamela: Domestic Servitude, Marriage, and the Novel." Eighteenth Century Fiction. Apr 1993, 5:3, 253-68.
Early Modern Bibliography: Servants & Apprentices: http://www.earlymodernweb.org.uk/embiblios/emservantbib.htm

II. Ungoverned relationships: Siblings.  Friendships between equals. How do they disturb the order outlined in governed relations? Where does their power lie? A new book, Lynn Shepherd's Clarissa's Painter: Portraiture, Illustration, and Representation in the Novels of Samuel Richardson (2009) might be useful here. Our thinking in class about the many paths of sexual energies in the novel might coincide with this topic. There are many directions here and, correspondingly, many possible critical materials.

III. I'm working out a topic on the innateness implied through casuistry's understanding of conscience vs the new model of the mind as analyzed by John Locke in his Essay on Human Understanding. More later.

IV.  Casuistry and epistolarity: A number of writers who ask 'where casuistry went' when it disappeared from the world suggest that it went to the novel, in particlar to the epistolary novel. What does this claim mean? Is epistolarity inherently linked to the methods or procedures of the casuists? Is problem-solving necessarily at the heart of the epistolary novel? Or is it that epistolarity lends itself to a telling of one's own story?

Start from what you know--examples of casuistry, critical material on casuistry, Richardson's novels. There is a lot of critical material on 18th. c. epistolarity. One of the early important books, Janet Gurkin Altman's Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form is available from OSU Press in pdf under an Open Access Initiative. Please click on the title for that access. We are reading Tom Keymer's chapter on Richardson and epistolarity for class. A somewhat earlier book, Carol Houlihan Flynn's Samuel Richardson: A Man of Letters (Princeton, 1982), especially in ch. 6 & 7 explores the idea of self-making in letters. An important book is Elizabeth Heckendorn Cook, Epistolary Bodies: Gender and Genre in the Eighteenth-Century Republic of Letters (Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1996). Another book is Clare Brant's Eighteeth Century Letters and British Culture (2006) and a recent article is Ann Louise Kibbie's The Estate, the Corpse, and the Letter: Posthumous Possession in "Clarissa," ELH, Vol. 74, No. 1 (Spring, 2007), pp. 117-143. A very recent book on the culture of writing in social ranks below those usually studied is Susan Whyman's The Pen and the People (2009).

V. Casuistry and Richardson’s new method of “writing to the  moment”: Richardson claimed, with some pride, that his new method, was new. The letters are written "while the hearts of the writers must be supposed to be wholly engaged in their subjects: the events at the time generally dubious--so that they abound not only with critical situations, but with what may be called instantaneous descriptions and reflections" (Preface). Does such a stylistic method coincide with or run counter to the method of casuistry? What happens to casuistry under the pressure of the moment? Is the casuistical burden perhaps shifted to the reader?

You may want to do a little reading on Richardson's "writing to the moment," but first, think this question out from your reading of casuistry cases and Richardson's novels. It's possible that this topic is more suited to a pro-seminar paper than a seminar paper.

VI. The Rape is a problem of central and varying interest. It can be combined with some of the topics above. Some works of interest are

Judith Wilt, He Could Go No Farther: A Modest Proposal about Lovelace and Clarissa, PMLA, Vol. 92, No. 1 (Jan., 1977), pp. 19-32.
William Warner, Proposal and Habitation: The Temporality and Authority of Interpretation in and about a Scene of Richardson's Clarissa boundary 2, Vol. 7, No. 2, Revisions of the Anglo-American Tradition: Part 1 (Winter, 1979), pp. 169-200.
William Warner, Reading Clarissa: The struggles of interpretation. New Haven: Yale, 1079.
Ian Donaldson, The Rape of Lucretia: A Myth and its Transformations . Oxford: Clarendon, 1982.
Paul Gabriel Bouce, ed. Sexuality in eighteenth-century Novels. Manchester, 1982.
Terry Eagleton, The Rape of Clarissa: Writing, Sexuality, and Class Struggle in Samuel Richardson. Minnesota, 1982.
Terry Castle, Clarissa's Ciphers: Meaning & Disruption in Richardson's "Clarissa." 1982.
Sylvana Tomaselli & Roy Porter (eds), Rape. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986. Has several useful articles, including Jennifer Temkin, Women, Rape and Law Reform, and Roy Porter, Rape: Does it Have a Historical Meaning?
Frances Ferguson, "Rape and the Rise of the Novel," Representations 20 (1987) 88-112. This article is part of a special issue called
Misogyny, Misandry, and Misanthropy.
Joy Kyunghae Lee, "The Commodification of Virtue: Chastity and the Virginal Body in Richardson's Clarissa," The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 36 (Spring 1995): 38-54.
Mary Patricia Martin, Reading Reform in Richardson's Clarissa, Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, Vol. 37, No. 3, Restoration and Eighteenth Century (Summer, 1997), pp. 595-614.
Sandra Macpherson, Lovelace, Ltd.ELH, Vol. 65, No. 1 (Spring, 1998), pp. 99-121
Antony E. Simpson, Popular Perceptions of Rape as a Capital Crime in Eighteenth-Century England: The Press and the Trial of Francis Charteris in the Old Bailey, February 1730 Law and History Review, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Spring, 2004), pp. 27-70
Katherine Binhammer, "Knowing Love: The Epistemology of Clarissa," ELH, Volume 74, Number 4, Winter 2007, pp. 859-879.


For a bibliography of representations of rape in popular culture: http://faculty.law.lsu.edu/ccorcos/lawhum/RAPEBIBLIOGRAPHY.htm

This illustration is a John Leech Sketch from Punch called "Symptoms of Wet Weather," dated 1846, just about a century after the first publication of Clarissa. This image comes from the John Leech Sketch archives from Punch. The same image is available for sale from a modern postcard vendor.

Clarissa cartoon by John Leech from Punch

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST--in addition to those listed above for paper topics (or among "useful materials")--are

Contents   Richardson and his readers / Carol Houlihan Flynn -- Reclassifying Clarissa / Nancy Armstrong -- Clarissa’s cruelty / Jayne Elizabeth Lewis -- Clarissa and early female fiction / Jerry C. Beasley -- Lady Bradshaigh reads and writes Clarissa / Janice Broder -- Clarissa’s daughters / Ruth Perry -- Belforded over / Julia Genster -- Clarissa versus Lovelace / Serge Soupel -- Dryden’s part in Clarissa / Rachel Trickett -- Reading the body in Clarissa / Julie McMaster -- Fatal letters / David Marshall -- Seduction pursued by other means / Isobel Grundy -- Eighteenth-century abduction laws and Clarissa / Jan I. Schwarz

For an online bibliography see http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/C18/biblio/richardson.html